Certified Case Manager Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The most appropriate action for a counselor in this scenario is to seek a court order for the transfusion. This approach recognizes the critical nature of the medical need for the child and addresses the potential for harm resulting from a lack of intervention. When a child’s health is at significant risk due to the refusal of necessary medical treatment, such as a blood transfusion, it may require legal intervention to ensure the child's welfare is prioritized. Courts can often make determinations in the best interest of the child, especially when parental decisions conflict with medical guidance and the child's right to receive care.

While involving the family in a meeting can facilitate dialogue and potentially address their concerns, it does not resolve the immediate health risk to the child. Reporting the situation as medical neglect may describe the scenario accurately but does not provide a solution to the urgent need for medical intervention. Consulting with a medical ethicist could offer insights into the ethical implications of the situation, but without a practical resolution, this step does not directly safeguard the child's health. Thus, seeking a court order is a necessary and appropriate action to ensure that the child receives the essential medical treatment required for their survival and well-being.